PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H170-PLUS D3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150711 |
Uptime | 3.2 Days |
Run Date | Feb 06 '19 at 10:28 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 65% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 367B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 156 136 123 121 117 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 150 126 114 90 74 MB/s
|
58.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
46.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 40x |
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 37x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 35x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Average | Total price: $478 |