Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '19 at 15:36
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 191
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 380
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 68
Parallax 59.6
55% 65.2 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 69.8
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T2535T120G 120GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 408 421 426 176 46 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 472
Write 415
Mixed 357
SusWrite 292
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 30.1
143% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 43.2
85% 165 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 86%
3GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 3.5 3.2 3.4 3.6 4.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
4.35% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 0.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 3.3
7% 6.97 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 9%
Innostor Innostor 16GB
2GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 101
Write 18.5
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 18.1
40% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 30.9
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.3
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $191
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback