Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 72.7 1-Core 103 2-Core 167 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 519 52% 422 Pts	64-Core 554 34% 554 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% HP(103C 2B4D) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.1% Below average	Lighting 41.6 Reflection 42 Parallax 36.2 34% 39.9 fps	MRender 36.3 Gravity 36.8 Splatting 33 29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 77 71 74 69 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 381 Write 343 Mixed 358 SusWrite 85.6 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 33.5 135% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 95.8 DQ Mixed 125 107% 162 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 134%
Sandisk SD7SB3Q-128G-1006 128GB 2,148 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 46GB free Firmware: X2180006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 305 303 302 290 302 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Read 400 Write 310 Mixed 191 SusWrite 300 67% 300 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 27.3 107% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 147 151% 245 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 690GB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 191 190 190 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 145 Mixed 77.8 SusWrite 189 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 8,407 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 18.7 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 13.2 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 95.3 42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

SSD
SD7SB3Q-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 78%, 2,148 samples	20x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	49x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	36x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	2x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $378

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16