Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	90.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '19 at 20:17
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 73.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 210 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 742 68% 569 Pts	64-Core 1311 81% 1311 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 868E) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.5% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 111 Parallax 104 94% 111 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 99.1 Splatting 80.8 83% 105 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 482 Write 458 Mixed 386 99% 442 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 88.3 4K Mixed 52.2 174% 60.1 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 369 278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 850GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 314 394 422 348 276 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 459 Write 459 Mixed 406 SusWrite 345 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 93.9 4K Mixed 52.5 177% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 364 DQ Mixed 372 280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 133%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 7,666 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 833GB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 124 Write 116 Mixed 60 74% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 27GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,475 Write 43.5 Mixed 82 1,099% 1,534 MB/s	4K Read 444 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2 18,767% 149 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate ST31000340NS 1TB-$95 7,250 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 510GB free Firmware: SN06 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,244 Write 32.2 Mixed 55.3 1,034% 1,444 MB/s	4K Read 425 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2.2 17,957% 143 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 114 113 112 119 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 115 Write 99 Mixed 104 SusWrite 114 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.7 317% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 94%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 20GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 79 84 80 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 129 Write 108 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 80.4 64% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 108%
WD My Book 25DA 8TB 718 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 70GB free, PID 25da Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 162 162 157 162 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 89.5 Write 101 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 160 143% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.2 112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB 1,079 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.4% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 24.9 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 23.1 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 94.4 42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $250Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $56Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $1,084

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16