Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180829
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '19 at 23:30
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Memory 96.5 1-Core 138 2-Core 277 95% 171 Pts	4-Core 507 8-Core 774 79% 641 Pts	64-Core 800 50% 800 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3795) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.7% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 123 Parallax 102 91% 112 fps	MRender 85.7 Gravity 101 Splatting 91.2 76% 92.8 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 207 199 193 195 193 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 487 Mixed 380 SusWrite 228 90% 399 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 99.6 4K Mixed 56 188% 65.8 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 356 268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 22GB free Firmware: X41200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 300 298 295 299 266 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 496 Write 354 Mixed 293 SusWrite 297 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 87.1 4K Mixed 27.3 123% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 215 194% 296 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 656GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 176 176 178 178 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 153 Mixed 87.7 SusWrite 177 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	MC Read 38.9 MC Write 37.3 MC Mixed 27.3 99% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 27.5 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 52.3 76% 52.3 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	933x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	868x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	768x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	452x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	443x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	345x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	481x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	400x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	335x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $756

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16