Asrock H81M-ITX/WiFi

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	67.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-ITX/WiFi (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150727
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '19 at 23:15
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 91.4 2-Core 185 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 336 43% 328 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.5% Good	Lighting 94.8 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 44.6 77% 64.8 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 47.5 Splatting 62 49% 59.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 184 155 157 155 148 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72.9% Very good	Read 256 Write 232 Mixed 212 SusWrite 167 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 42.8 140% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 193 144% 193 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 124%
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160 11,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 50GB free Firmware: MU01.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 202 74 74 75 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 459 Write 412 Mixed 124 SusWrite 139 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 32.9 108% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 105 102% 166 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 2x4GB 3,047 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.7% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 13.9 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 11.7 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-ITX/WiFi Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-ITX/WiFi

CPU
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	8x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	7x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	4x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x

SSD
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples	5x
480GB 480GBT-forceBench 80%, 226 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	5x
9905471-074.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 54%, 1,544 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16