Clevo M660SR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemClevo M660SR  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO M660SR
Memory1.2 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '19 at 18:22
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4500
mPGA 479m, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25% Poor
Memory 44.5
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 47.6
28% 41.3 Pts
4-Core 36.1
8-Core 25.8
4% 30.9 Pts
64-Core 17.6
1% 17.6 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
VIA Chrome9 HC IGP WDDM 1.1
Clevo(1558 0669) 256MB
Driver: VTGUModeDX32.dll Ver. 8.14.14.87
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 0.19
0% 0.11 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200BEVS-16VAT0 320GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 30 50 54 37 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 16.5
Write 25.9
Mixed 10.1
SusWrite 43.1
17% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
2048, 512 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
7.3% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.2
5% 1.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback