User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardEVGA X299 DARK
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '19 at 00:29
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900X-$620
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 70.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 212
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 952
85% 720 Pts
64-Core 1792
111% 1792 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 171
Parallax 170
125% 165 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 168
Splatting 120
111% 137 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 365 350 334 328 321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 394
Mixed 346
SusWrite 349
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 52.1
176% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 334
255% 345 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
13GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 26 24 27 19 20 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.2% Average
Read 176
Write 160
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 32.5
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 15.2
81% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 91
DQ Mixed 57.2
81% 156 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 89%
WD WD740ADFD-00NLR1 74GB
9GB free
Firmware: 21.07QR5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 57 59 57 60 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 50
Write 50.2
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 58.8
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 48%
Maxtor OneTouch II 204GB
149GB free, PID 7110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 17.5
Write 37.2
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 37.4
42% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.3
173% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 26%
VendorCo ProductCode 10GB
6GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 4 3.8 1.5 2.5 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.66% Terrible
Read 0.3
Write 1.5
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 2.7
2% 1.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 45.3
MC Mixed 27.9
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 8.8
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback