Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '19 at 19:23
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 235
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 597
68% 530 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 31.7
29% 30.9 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 32.1
28% 34 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 437 440 438 405 292 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 465
Mixed 450
SusWrite 409
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 42.8
160% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 366
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
90GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 433 433 434 437 441 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 471
Mixed 390
SusWrite 436
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 44.9
168% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 369
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
766GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 98 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 95.8
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 96.5
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 100%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
548GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 105 106 105 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 69.6
Write 88.7
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 105
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 87%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
753GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 91 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 89.8
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 90.6
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB GKH400UD25608-1600 HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback