Asus ROG MAXIMUS X APEX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics65% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive556% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X APEX  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171221
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '19 at 13:24
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 99.4
1-Core 169
2-Core 328
108% 199 Pts
4-Core 653
8-Core 1134
108% 894 Pts
64-Core 1,400
87% 1,400 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 111%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2327 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 86
Parallax 82.7
64% 82.5 fps
MRender 83.9
Gravity 77.8
Splatting 81.3
66% 81 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1698 1754 1778 1793 1800 1793 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
556% Outstanding
Read 2,356
Write 1,977
Mixed 2,145
SusWrite 1,769
464% 2,062 MB/s
4K Read 288
4K Write 257
4K Mixed 268
916% 271 MB/s
DQ Read 1,700
DQ Write 1,453
DQ Mixed 1,543
1,166% 1,566 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 556%
Great: 559%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
172GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 692 290 291 290 289 290 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,076
Write 944
Mixed 473
SusWrite 357
159% 712 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 58.3
218% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 471
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 296
303% 485 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 157%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
353GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2347 812 814 813 815 813 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,763
Write 2,562
Mixed 2028
SusWrite 1,069
471% 2,105 MB/s
4K Read 75.8
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 108
358% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,670
DQ Write 1,454
DQ Mixed 1,533
1,157% 1,553 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 357%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
295GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 490 494 495 496 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 521
Write 490
Mixed 417
SusWrite 492
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 55.6
199% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 129%
Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235
5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 219 204 211 220 215 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 205
Mixed 84
SusWrite 214
130% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.6
227% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 122%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4271 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 46.3
MC Write 47.3
MC Mixed 32.3
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 27.3
SC Write 52
SC Mixed 38.9
113% 39.4 GB/s
Latency 39
103% 39 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 121%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X APEX Builds (Compare 297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X APEX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $883
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback