Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 100% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	2048 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20181106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '19 at 07:12
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Memory 78.8 1-Core 147 2-Core 292 93% 173 Pts	4-Core 582 8-Core 1,140 102% 861 Pts	64-Core 1,622 100% 1,622 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2999) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 130 Parallax 115 103% 124 fps	MRender 99.1 Gravity 111 Splatting 92.7 82% 101 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA SX8200PNP 1TB 2,146 User benchmarks, average bench 267% 720GB free (System drive) Firmware: R090 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 787 901 992 1103 1094 1096 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 1,749 Write 1,249 Mixed 1,052 SusWrite 996 282% 1,261 MB/s	4K Read 53.6 4K Write 183 4K Mixed 71 269% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 462 DQ Write 1082 DQ Mixed 466 443% 670 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 355%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 8TB 685 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 3.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 285 288 288 287 286 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 289 Write 252 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 286 166% 229 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 1.6 338% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 173%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C15 4x16GB 256 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 54.5 MC Mixed 29.8 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 10 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	72x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	68x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	56x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	93x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	41x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16