Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive4.17% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateMar 09 '19 at 16:55
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
61% Good
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
71% 151 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 383
52% 382 Pts
64-Core 384
26% 384 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61%
Great: 65%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$86
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 34 25 34 51 107 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
4.17% Terrible
Read 28.5
Write 41.5
Mixed 43.1
SusWrite 44.9
9% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
1% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 138 138 136 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 66
Write 103
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 134
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.8
187% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$39
129GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 42 43 43 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 32.5
Write 39.2
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 38.6
25% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
49% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 115%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 25.7
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 18.3
18% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 97%
WD My Book 1140 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 27.5
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 16.3
33% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59%
Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 3,124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $972
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback