Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171121
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '19 at 12:45
Run Duration	330 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$53 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Memory 68.8 1-Core 33.9 2-Core 58.1 37% 53.6 Pts	4-Core 58.3 8-Core 56.7 8% 57.5 Pts	64-Core 64.2 4% 64.2 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.15 Parallax 0.56 2% 1.64 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 0.09 1% 1.68 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung SV4002H 40GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: QP200-03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.3 2.6 2.6 3.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Read 3.5 Write 2.3 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 2.5 2% 2.95 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 17%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 14GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.2 5.6 5.2 5.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	6.71% Terrible	Read 30.8 Write 4.8 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 5.3 12% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.71% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 4.7 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 2.6 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	752x
Core i5-2400Intel $71Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	289x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	289x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	634x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	367x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	140x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	105x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	94x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	501x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	325x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350