Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120510
Uptime23 Days
Run DateMar 12 '19 at 16:16
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$195
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 96
2-Core 185
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 458
48% 385 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 36.9
26% 32.7 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 30.4
29% 36.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 60 58 58 56 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 286
Write 134
Mixed 171
SusWrite 61.5
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 17.5
68% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 113
102% 156 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
63GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 67 85 109 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 95
Write 98
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 84.1
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
16GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 66 67 65 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 54.5
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 65.6
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $223
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback