Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141008
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 09:17
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 157
53% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 620
61% 499 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 347.88
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.7% Average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 56
Parallax 60.7
41% 55.6 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 65
Splatting 57
52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 361 342 303 300 303 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,825
Write 709
Mixed 526
SusWrite 332
185% 848 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 50.4
229% 94 MB/s
DQ Read 1,030
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 40
181% 431 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 190%
Great: 243%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
89GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 69 71 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 83.5
Write 107
Mixed 104
SusWrite 75.6
69% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 76%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 104
Write 114
Mixed 75
SusWrite 115
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1.5TB
726GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 36.8
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 37.4
46% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
93% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 34.4
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $982
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback