Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m7-6Y75 1,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Memory 61.8 1-Core 37.6 2-Core 63.4 36% 54.3 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 104 14% 103 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake) 10,056 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 071B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.92% Terrible	Lighting 6.77 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.22 6% 4.83 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 2.57 Splatting 6.35 4% 4.38 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.92% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron 1100 SATA 512GB 5,508 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 375GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0DL002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 309 267 280 291 284 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 367 Write 297 Mixed 325 SusWrite 292 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 27.8 91% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 287 200% 250 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
0 2x8GB 1,950 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	47.9% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 17.2 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 11.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 10,056 samples	174x

SSD
THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 109%, 23,829 samples	15x
SSDSCKKF256H6 SATA 256GBIntelBench 64%, 3,152 samples	9x
1100 SATA 256GBMicronBench 73%, 16,265 samples	7x

RAM
2x4GB0Bench 58%, 1,733 samples	107x
2x8GB0Bench 63%, 1,950 samples	36x
H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GBHynixBench 58%, 6,118 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16