Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 14:04
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 30.4
2-Core 71.5
40% 58.7 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 142
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 90.6
6% 90.6 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 52.8
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 73.6
43% 67.7 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 70
Splatting 72
59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 312 312 312 308 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 473
Write 312
Mixed 307
SusWrite 304
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 30.7
117% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 30.4
66% 133 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 126%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 185 184 188 187 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 23.3
Write 138
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 185
69% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST4000VN008-2DR166 2TB
807GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 39 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 89.3
Write 69.3
Mixed 35
SusWrite 39.4
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 0.27 MB/s
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB
984GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 106 107 107 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 98.8
Write 99.5
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 105
72% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 96%
SAMSUNG HD321KJ 320GB
72GB free, PID 00a2
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 36
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 36.2
47% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 14.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,035
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback