| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M (all builds) |
| Memory | 18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130315 |
| Uptime | 1.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 12 '19 at 17:59 |
| Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 37% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53.5%
Above average
|
61% 105 Pts
|
27% 208 Pts
|
14% 221 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: Press
|
55.7%
Above average
|
57% 72.6 fps
|
53% 65.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 65 79 83 94 76 MB/s
|
46.8%
Average
|
46% 63.2 MB/s
|
52% 0.57 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
229GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 62 61 62 MB/s
|
35.3%
Below average
|
43% 58 MB/s
|
147% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.9 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 MB/s
|
8.74%
Terrible
|
15% 12.6 MB/s
|
112% 2.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
41%
Average
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
42% 94.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M Builds (Compare 67 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 9x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 7x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 4x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $342 |