Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '19 at 23:05
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	72%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 50.9 1-Core 129 2-Core 260 76% 146 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 464 53% 412 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.1% Average	Lighting 59.3 Reflection 62.4 Parallax 57.2 48% 59.7 fps	MRender 58.3 Gravity 50.6 Splatting 63.1 48% 57.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59 34,063 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 565 573 538 381 556 211 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 2,076 Write 895 Mixed 922 SusWrite 470 240% 1,091 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 54.9 193% 68 MB/s	DQ Read 788 DQ Write 666 DQ Mixed 434 405% 629 MB/s
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 271%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 47GB free Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 113 84 102 89 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 346 Write 134 Mixed 124 SusWrite 100 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 10.5 56% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 48.9 83% 166 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 73%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 789GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 116 118 119 117 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 107 Write 103 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 117 70% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB 22,274 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	55% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 19 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 16.9 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 157 25% 157 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	284x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	243x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	132x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $557

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16