Lenovo 056965U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 056965U (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	17.8 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120810
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '19 at 04:08
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 79.1 1-Core 84.5 2-Core 184 66% 116 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 532 53% 432 Pts	64-Core 644 40% 644 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2990) CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 425.31 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.4% Poor	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 111 Parallax 0.09 0% 37.1 fps	MRender 87 Gravity 93.6 Splatting 83.3 72% 87.9 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 30 27 33 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 45.2 Mixed 31 SusWrite 30.9 26% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 105GB free Firmware: 1H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 75.7 Write 79 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 79.1 53% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 69%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB 3,961 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 764GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 114 113 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 117 Write 117 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 114 140% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 71%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,895 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 9GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 25 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 25.8 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 25.5 33% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 247GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 31 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 32 Write 32.5 Mixed 27 SusWrite 30.3 41% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0- F3-10666CL9-2 M391B5273DH0- F3-10666CL9-2 M391B5273DH0- Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0N M391B5273DH0- Kingston 99U5471-024.A 28GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.1% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 25.8 78% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 056965U

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)