| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120803 |
| Uptime | 4.2 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 14 '19 at 15:46 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76%
Very good
|
76% 131 Pts
|
51% 409 Pts
|
31% 502 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8619) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.6%
Above average
|
56% 66.4 fps
|
53% 64.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 94 110 44 60 58 MB/s
|
55.5%
Above average
|
52% 232 MB/s
|
103% 36.6 MB/s
|
40% 61.9 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 125 124 125 127 MB/s
|
74.8%
Very good
|
84% 115 MB/s
|
178% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.8%
Average
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
60% 66.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,496 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 387x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 205x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 131x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 103x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 97x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 87x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $906 |