I-life ZED AIR H6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemI-life ZED AIR H6  (all builds)
MotherboardTo To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171010
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 17:26
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 39.1
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 88.1
28% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 91.1
8-Core 50.8
10% 70.9 Pts
64-Core 57.8
4% 57.8 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.73
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 5.48
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 77 56 57 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 331
Write 231
Mixed 237
SusWrite 80.5
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 5.8
32% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 104
75% 98.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback