Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '19 at 00:55
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 120
54% 87.5 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 318
32% 262 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1456 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 33.4
30% 34.9 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 27.9
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507KC4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 129 118 109 100 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.5% Average
Read 234
Write 189
Mixed 200
SusWrite 112
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 16.8
59% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 116
99% 144 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 84 87 87 86 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 92
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 86.5
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
2TB free
Firmware: ML6OA6U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 125
Write 126
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 132
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.6
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.6
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback