| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 68% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131002 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 28 '19 at 23:57 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
| CPU Throttled | 68% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
49.1%
Average
|
44% 65.7 Pts
|
16% 125 Pts
|
5% 85.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
ASRock(1849 9616) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
|
0.49%
Terrible
|
0% 0.69 fps
|
1% 0.75 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 13 10 12 11 MB/s
|
4.85%
Terrible
|
6% 7.85 MB/s
|
17% 0.1 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
5GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 23 24 23 20 MB/s
|
11%
Very poor
|
24% 18.7 MB/s
|
62% 1.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 333 MHz
|
21.7%
Poor
|
19% 6.67 GB/s
|
19% 6.57 GB/s
|
48% 84.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GM-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 214 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX - $59
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 81x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 26x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 13x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $193 |