Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '19 at 03:12
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 141
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 421
43% 346 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.5% Average
Lighting 48
Reflection 55.4
Parallax 45
39% 49.5 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 48
Splatting 62.6
49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S 240GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 139 102 106 88 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 451
Write 363
Mixed 171
SusWrite 143
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 37.8
137% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 111
93% 134 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 84%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
91GB free
Firmware: 1B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 315 315 314 316 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,291
Write 1,032
Mixed 501
SusWrite 411
180% 809 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 53.5
190% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 515
DQ Write 470
DQ Mixed 474
361% 487 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 157%
Great: 236%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
465GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 56 57 55 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 72
Write 69.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 56.9
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 59%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 200 204 192 201 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 197
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 199
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
206% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
485GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 92 92 91 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 95.3
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 91.9
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 83%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
296GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 85 87 86 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 86
Write 78.3
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 86
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 19.1
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback