Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180510
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 01 '19 at 16:14
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 167 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 334 44% 327 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 36.9 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 38.5 30% 35.7 fps	MRender 39.5 Gravity 39.8 Splatting 38.3 32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AHB SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 41 52 56 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 71.5 Write 81.3 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 45.9 43% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 54%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 102GB free Firmware: 3.ADA SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 45 54 57 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 90.8 Write 81.8 Mixed 47 SusWrite 48.7 49% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 54%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65 22,230 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 524GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 114 116 115 115 115 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 118 Write 117 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 111 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	85x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16