Packard IXTREME I9501 NL

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard IXTREME I9501 NL (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard TBGM01
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081114
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	May 09 '19 at 20:04
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	63% Good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 61.7 2-Core 112 57% 88 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 284 30% 240 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 3208) CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Lighting 35.3 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 30.1 29% 32.6 fps	MRender 36.3 Gravity 31.6 Splatting 31.7 27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 197 165 166 156 152 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.3% Good	Read 259 Write 249 Mixed 228 SusWrite 177 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 38 126% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 198 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 124%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 165GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 102 102 105 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 70 SusWrite 103 69% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 24 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 26.2 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 24.2 19% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.4 144% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 66%
CADlink Technology 8GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 6864 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 5.3 9.6 10 10 10 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	8.34% Terrible	Read 24 Write 10.8 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 8.2 15% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 64% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.34% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% null MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.6% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 10.9 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 10.7 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Packard IXTREME I9501 NL

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)