Asrock X99M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateMay 11 '19 at 11:44
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 238
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 725
75% 603 Pts
64-Core 943
58% 943 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.4% Good
Lighting 79.7
Reflection 87
Parallax 76.1
65% 81 fps
MRender 80.1
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 69
60% 74.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,874
Write 1,305
Mixed 520
270% 1,233 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 40.6
168% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 865
DQ Write 620
DQ Mixed 708
538% 731 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
28GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 135 144 133 132 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 184
Write 142
Mixed 141
SusWrite 130
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 31.1
127% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 135
108% 152 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 61%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
8GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 481
Write 450
Mixed 396
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 51.1
174% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 339
256% 342 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate ST8000DM005-2EH1 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: DN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 169 169 174 175 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 166
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 170
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
450% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 21.7
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 20.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $489
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback