PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A34 |
Motherboard | MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) (all builds) |
Memory | 13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181101 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 15 '19 at 11:22 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
|
56.6%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17
|
31.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 174 73 32 127 26 MB/s
|
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
161GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 65 65 53 19 MB/s
|
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 817x |
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 339x |
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 269x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 326x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 265x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 200x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $459 |