Compaq-presario BK120AA-ABM CQ5309LA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemCompaq-presario BK120AA-ABM CQ5309LA  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Narra6
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 18:26
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Athlon II X3 435-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
26.6% Poor
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 96.8
33% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 150
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 148
10% 148 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
EVGA(3842 1450) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
7.82% Terrible
Lighting 27.8
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 26.5
7% 27.9 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 31.3
Splatting 23.3
9% 27.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.82%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 27 34 32 27 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 97
Write 89.8
Mixed 24
SusWrite 26.1
43% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB
455GB free
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 73 96 120 111 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 126
Write 121
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 102
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 73%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
349GB free, PID b159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 17 19 18 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 18.2
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 17.7
25% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 40%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical BK120AA-ABM CQ5309LA Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Compaq-presario BK120AA-ABM CQ5309LA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $280
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback