Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	8.79GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.79GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8.78906 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 18 '19 at 11:51
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Common KVM processor 2,228 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 5 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 87.9 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 228 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 508 61% 471 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 98%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 268GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,916 Write 882 Mixed 1,499 316% 1432 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 45.7 150% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 145 110% 148 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 81%
IT1167B USB Flash Disk 2GB 294 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1167 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.9 2.5 3 5.4 5.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	2.05% Terrible	Read 7.7 Write 5 Mixed 5 SusWrite 4.3 7% 5.5 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.05% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.6% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 14.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 15 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16