Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (all builds)
Memory	22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150323
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	May 21 '19 at 22:38
Run Duration	319 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	63% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 71 2-Core 134 59% 96.3 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 419 39% 324 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088 6,806 User benchmarks, average bench 47% EVGA(3842 2790) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47% Average	Lighting 57.7 Reflection 54.3 Parallax 78.6 47% 63.5 fps	MRender 67.2 Gravity 61.5 Splatting 47.4 47% 58.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: X211200 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 163 137 126 122 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 411 Write 281 Mixed 120 SusWrite 141 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 23.9 90% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 110 112% 184 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 99%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB 1,852 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 13GB free Firmware: 050B SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 15 14 15 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 26.5 Mixed 23 SusWrite 14.4 17% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 91%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 5,792 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 188GB free Firmware: 0406 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 15 14 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 24.5 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 14.3 16% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.5 188% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 1,232 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 8GB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 91 107 103 108 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 100 Write 68 Mixed 32.3 SusWrite 99.1 97% 75 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 68% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 76%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 453GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 7.7 8.6 8.3 9.1 8.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 30 Write 23.7 Mixed 26 SusWrite 8.4 28% 22 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 1.1 186% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 85GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 101 113 107 117 107 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 171 Write 151 Mixed 117 SusWrite 110 180% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.2 218% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 86%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 108 125 117 125 119 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 121 Write 129 Mixed 93.7 SusWrite 119 157% 116 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 1.5 350% 4.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 5.2 DQ Mixed 2 249% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 96%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 371GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 7.6 8.6 7.7 8.3 7.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 23.8 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 8.1 28% 22 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 1.2 175% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 98%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 96GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 7.9 8.7 8.3 9.2 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.48% Terrible	Read 30.3 Write 28.3 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 8.5 29% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.48% Great: 23%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 256GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 155GB free, PID 0743 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.6 8.7 8.3 9.1 8.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.96% Terrible	Read 30.5 Write 14.7 Mixed 18 SusWrite 8.4 22% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.4 93% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.96% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB 924 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.9% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 15.2 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 13.1 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	441x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	215x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	67x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	58x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	48x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $160Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	29x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	28x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	29x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBCorsairBench 66%, 6,389 samples	22x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16