Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1350 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180301
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	May 23 '19 at 20:57
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 82.5 1-Core 101 2-Core 236 77% 140 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 760 73% 600 Pts	64-Core 1,096 68% 1,096 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.6% Average	Lighting 43.7 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 14.7 36% 40.9 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 71.4 Splatting 73.4 59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 16,522 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 178 Write 55 Mixed 88.7 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 10.8 48% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 14.1 DQ Write 15 DQ Mixed 11.3 9% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 98%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 15GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 57.5 Write 1.5 Mixed 42.5 26% 33.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	63.9% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 18.7 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $129

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	401x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	266x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	171x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	157x
RTX 2060Nvidia $323Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	109x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	103x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	66x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	64x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	54x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	77x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	65x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $569

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16