Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	80.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '19 at 05:37
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 62.2 1-Core 110 2-Core 222 71% 131 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 854 75% 638 Pts	64-Core 1,180 73% 1,180 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.5% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 125 Parallax 114 84% 114 fps	MRender 81.9 Gravity 115 Splatting 80.6 75% 92.4 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 133%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 1,651 User benchmarks, average bench 14% AMD(1002 0B0C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1219 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Lighting 13.2 Reflection 24.2 Parallax 17.1 11% 18.2 fps	MRender 22.4 Gravity 13.2 Splatting 25.6 17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0309 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 64 96 97 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 449 Write 184 Mixed 225 SusWrite 93.4 52% 238 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 17.3 99% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 56.8 61% 103 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 72%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 48GB free Firmware: M0CR021 SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 460 247 215 222 228 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 408 Write 467 Mixed 373 SusWrite 306 88% 389 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 95.1 4K Mixed 39.1 139% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 325 246% 331 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 99%
Hitachi HMS5C4040BLE640 4TB 902 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1TB free Firmware: MPAOA5D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 127 126 123 126 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 124 Write 117 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 125 68% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 73%
Hitachi HMS5C4040BLE640 4TB 902 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2.5TB free Firmware: MPAOA5D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 126 129 129 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 123 Write 123 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 128 70% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 73%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 183GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 96 94 96 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 75.8 Write 56.7 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 94.8 52% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBD 2x16GB 1,600 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.1% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 25.4 78% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 25.4 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)