| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Gbt___ GBTUACPI (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte 965P-S3 |
| Memory | 3.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20070528 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | May 26 '19 at 09:44 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
40.3%
Average
|
35% 51 Pts
|
13% 103 Pts
|
7% 113 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
21.9%
Poor
|
21% 27.6 fps
|
24% 30 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$46
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 172 175 136 88 119 MB/s
|
48.3%
Average
|
42% 188 MB/s
|
94% 30.8 MB/s
|
32% 47.2 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
516GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 100 96 99 98 MB/s
|
57%
Above average
|
66% 90.1 MB/s
|
150% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
ASMT 2115 500GB
96GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
35% 26.6 MB/s
|
40% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
15% 5.13 GB/s
|
12% 4.27 GB/s
|
35% 116 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GBTUACPI Builds (Compare 32 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Gbt___ GBTUACPI
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+AMDBench 39%, 3,286 samples | 3x |
| Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples | 2x |
| Pentium D 3.00GHzIntel $98Bench 30%, 4,281 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 7600 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 1,212 samples | 3x |
| GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 3x |
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |