Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 15 days ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131106
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 27 '19 at 00:06
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
46.2% Average
SC Int 81.1
SC Float 49.2
SC Mixed 61.5
51% 63.9 Pts
QC Int 323
QC Float 196
QC Mixed 245
58% 255 Pts
MC Int 246
MC Float 195
MC Mixed 224
33% 222 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 8490) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.81
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.5
1% 2.17 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.2
1% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$53
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 230 254 200 273 268 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 379
Mixed 381
SusWrite 256
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 51.1
168% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 11.9
DQ Mixed 51.5
61% 114 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
120GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 98 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 104
Write 98.5
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 96.6
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
392GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 136 135 134 136 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 147
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 134
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 21,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $96

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $515
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $220Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $606SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback