PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 7.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Supermicro X8DTL (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X8DTL |
Memory | 8.7 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121116 |
Uptime | 6.1 Days |
Run Date | May 29 '19 at 17:12 |
Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5560
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
70.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
7.26%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBCOC32P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 28 20 26 24 MB/s
|
19.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
102GB free
Firmware: VT100-52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 42 41 40 41 MB/s
|
25.5%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
756GB free
Firmware: JP4OA25C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 129 123 124 124 MB/s
|
74.1%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
56GB free
Firmware: AM003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 65 65 66 66 66 MB/s
|
41.6%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
311GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 30 24 28 26 MB/s
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$90
262GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 65 65 66 66 66 MB/s
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70BH1-CF8 M393B1K70BH1-CF8 MXIC 25L3205 52GB
1066, 1066, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 36864 MB
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples | 23x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 20x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 17x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 10x |
RTX 3050Nvidia $230Bench 75%, 43,922 samples | 9x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 9x |
SSD | |
---|---|
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples | 15x |
MegaRAID SAS RMB 247GBLSIBench 103%, 15 samples | 11x |
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 114% - Outstanding | Total price: $117 |