Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 30 '19 at 15:51
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 63.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 208 68% 125 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 681 66% 543 Pts	64-Core 849 53% 849 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 147 Reflection 186 Parallax 182 120% 171 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 173 Splatting 121 112% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43 14,860 User benchmarks, average bench 151% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 966 870 361 251 223 222 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	158% Outstanding	Read 1,161 Write 1,021 Mixed 830 SusWrite 482 195% 874 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 83.2 4K Mixed 49.3 165% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 744 DQ Write 646 DQ Mixed 512 434% 634 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 210%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 84GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 152 151 151 152 152 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 476 Mixed 401 SusWrite 186 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 97.2 4K Mixed 55.1 188% 65.2 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 355 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 115%
Crucial M550 512GB-$283 5,683 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 306GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 449 450 457 457 455 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 433 Write 461 Mixed 322 SusWrite 452 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 93.9 4K Mixed 39.9 144% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 232 204% 302 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 111%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 595GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 227 227 227 227 227 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 223 Write 109 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 227 118% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.5 308% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 62%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB 310 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 29GB free, PID 5100 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 10 10 8.9 11 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 59.8 Write 41 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 11.4 48% 38.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.6 109% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GB 410 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.6% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 22.6 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 25 SC Mixed 21.4 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)