PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 9.2 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110311 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Jun 06 '19 at 17:41 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
74.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 206 157 111 126 95 MB/s
|
61.1%
Good
|
|||
Asmedia ASMT1051 1TB
539GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 14 14 MB/s
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 2TB
952GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 15 14 MB/s
|
12.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 58GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 568x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 533x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 487x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 270x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 154x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 135x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 72x |
A400 480GBKingston $37Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 65x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |