Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive16.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '19 at 15:27
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40% Average
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 121
43% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 313
35% 271 Pts
64-Core 341
23% 341 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$399
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.9% Good
Lighting 204
Reflection 184
Parallax 221
65% 203 fps
MRender 158
Gravity 196
Splatting 131
70% 162 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 71%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 15 42 20 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.7% Very poor
Read 192
Write 7.5
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 18.3
15% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.8
28% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 47%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$103
238GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 45 46 46 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 450
Write 45.4
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 45.3
33% 156 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
58% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 135%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
484GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 50 51 51 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 132
Write 48.7
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 50.4
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 46 45 47 47 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 184
Write 4.7
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 44.3
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.4
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 2,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $810
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback