PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A34 |
Motherboard | MSI B350 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A34) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170622 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jun 12 '19 at 01:29 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
56.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 319 328 208 92 185 MB/s
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
128GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 95 96 106 109 106 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
66.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 222x |
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 109x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 89x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 100x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 68x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 68x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $366 |