Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 18:47
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 143
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 406
40% 329 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 99
Parallax 98.7
90% 103 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 84.5
77% 95.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 306 308 303 307 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 433
Write 337
Mixed 384
SusWrite 306
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 32.2
129% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 32.1
71% 142 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84%
Great: 129%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 100 100 95 98 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 73.4
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 97.6
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 87%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
12GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 40 40 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 37
Write 28.7
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 40.5
25% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$53
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 68 67 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 128
Write 132
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 68.7
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 69%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
859GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 124 124 121 121 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
61% Good
Read 91
Write 90.1
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 121
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback