Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory11.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180613
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 10:41
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4790-$349
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.3% Good
SC Int 97.5
SC Float 32.8
SC Mixed 107
55% 79 Pts
QC Int 308
QC Float 325
QC Mixed 324
57% 319 Pts
MC Int 466
MC Float 494
MC Mixed 476
32% 479 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$250
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72% Very good
Lighting 223
Reflection 204
Parallax 214
68% 214 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 210
Splatting 166
75% 175 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$270
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.2 2.4 20 23 37 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.7% Poor
Read 14.7
Write 57.7
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 13.9
6% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 5.6
20% 9.33 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 218
198% 302 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$259
3TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.2 1.6 10 16 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 29.8
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 8.6
18% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.3
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 117%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$179
2TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.2 1.9 16 12 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 53.8
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 9.8
22% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 98%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$179
531GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.1 1.6 8.9 12 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 47.2
Write 35.2
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 7.6
20% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 98%
UDISK PDU01-4G 8AH2.0 4GB
4GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.6 0.4 1.2 1.7 2.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.16% Terrible
Read 4.9
Write 2.3
Mixed 3
SusWrite 1.1
3% 2.83 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.16%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 8,693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $199Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $245Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback