Asrock H77M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H77M (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130809
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '19 at 18:38
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 83 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 152 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 352 38% 304 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367A) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Lighting 68.1 Reflection 68.3 Parallax 66.2 56% 67.5 fps	MRender 72.4 Gravity 63.1 Splatting 53.7 51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,297 Write 3,396 Mixed 3,651 773% 3,448 MB/s	4K Read 257 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 173 693% 195 MB/s	DQ Read 742 DQ Write 373 DQ Mixed 570 420% 562 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$58 5,099 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: SN04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 182 185 188 188 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 176 Mixed 90.8 SusWrite 184 114% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 244% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB 3,312 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1.5TB free Firmware: MN5OA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 119 125 128 127 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 129 Write 133 Mixed 71 SusWrite 126 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 2,340 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	45.9% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 14.6 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77M Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	54x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	43x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	42x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	31x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16