PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160627 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 17 '19 at 15:34 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
18.4%
Very poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 63 74 50 69 68 MB/s
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
971GB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 66 77 51 70 68 MB/s
|
46.1%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 102 102 101 101 MB/s
|
57.6%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 117 120 119 120 MB/s
|
55.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 433x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 294x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 176x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 177x |
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 86x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 84x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $134 |