Asrock Q77M vPro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Q77M vPro  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJun 24 '19 at 09:13
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 178
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 404
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30% Poor
Lighting 37.6
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 32.4
31% 32.1 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 35.3
Splatting 33.6
29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30%
Great: 28%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 119 82 68 62 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 455
Mixed 385
SusWrite 120
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 48.4
161% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 355
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 134%
Corsair Force MP300 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$75
79GB free
Firmware: E8FM11.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 140 138 140 141 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 497
Write 451
Mixed 455
SusWrite 185
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 39.9
135% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 333
259% 355 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 128%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
398GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 123 122 128 100 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 136
Write 124
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 98.6
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 128 128 129 127 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 101
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 127
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 99%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$231
799GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 134 139 137 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 153
Write 156
Mixed 94.7
SusWrite 131
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 1.6
398% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF Transcend JM1600KLH-4G 9905584-032.A00LF 9905584-032.A00LF 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.3% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q77M vPro Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Q77M vPro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $507
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback