| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 16.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140801 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 25 '19 at 03:38 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.8%
Above average
|
58% 93.2 Pts
|
28% 208 Pts
|
13% 211 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9
|
34.8%
Below average
|
36% 38.3 fps
|
33% 40.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 89 13 19 33 34 MB/s
|
16.6%
Very poor
|
13% 59.3 MB/s
|
30% 9.43 MB/s
|
6% 8.5 MB/s
|
|
Liteon LCH-256V2S-11 2.5 7mm 256GB
120GB free
Firmware: FC8110C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 180 184 181 181 183 MB/s
|
51.9%
Above average
|
41% 182 MB/s
|
98% 33.4 MB/s
|
36% 50.6 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
118GB free
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 59 60 59 59 MB/s
|
34.5%
Below average
|
39% 52.8 MB/s
|
106% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.2%
Poor
|
19% 6.67 GB/s
|
20% 6.87 GB/s
|
52% 77.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 140 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 21x |
| A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples | 17x |
| A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples | 18x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 12x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |