Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	14.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130417
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '19 at 12:58
Run Duration	354 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	88%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Memory 56 1-Core 64.8 2-Core 111 46% 77.2 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 276 31% 241 Pts	64-Core 269 17% 269 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCD) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte Nvidia Geforce GTX 1650 4GB Gaming OC CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.8% Below average	Lighting 46.7 Reflection 42.2 Parallax 41.1 38% 43.3 fps	MRender 39.7 Gravity 48.5 Splatting 47.2 37% 45.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 86 94 97 94 93 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.4% Below average	Read 206 Write 197 Mixed 179 SusWrite 90.1 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 7.9 25% 8.33 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 32.3 74% 160 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 46GB free Firmware: CR100-13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 51 49 52 52 52 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 68.7 Write 75 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 51.5 43% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 44%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 543GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 77 78 81 83 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 106 Write 113 Mixed 64.8 SusWrite 78.9 67% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 83%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 232GB free Firmware: 1AA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 55 58 54 54 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 71.2 Write 72.8 Mixed 49 SusWrite 54.5 46% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 88GB free Firmware: 1AA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 56 58 58 58 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 87.7 Write 101 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 56.6 54% 74 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 62%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 360GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 93 94 94 91 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 96.8 Write 80.8 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 91.7 59% 80 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 83%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 409GB free Firmware: CR100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 63 66 66 66 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 39.5 Write 46.3 Mixed 29 SusWrite 64.1 33% 44.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 44%
WD 10EADS External 1TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 203GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 5.9 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	4.46% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 20.2 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 6.2 17% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 12% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 4.46% Great: 21%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 3TB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 71 74 72 71 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 48.3 Write 73.2 Mixed 55 SusWrite 70.7 88% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.4 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 72%
Intenso External USB 3.0 6TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 481GB free, PID 578e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 70 73 71 70 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 81.4 Write 99 Mixed 55 SusWrite 69.9 104% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.5 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 98%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 665GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.8 7.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 24.2 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 6.8 27% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 908GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.4 6.5 6.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 27.8 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 6.5 28% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 44%
WD Elements 1.5TB 5,064 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 308GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.7 6.8 6.7 6.9 7.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 29 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 6.8 29% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 22%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 190GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 32 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 6.6 30% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 240 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 13.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 6.4 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF Builds (Compare 932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	363x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	223x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	111x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	99x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	71x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	54x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	29x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	26x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 54%, 8,026 samples	28x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	25x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16