Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 23:38
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 507
68% 508 Pts
64-Core 508
32% 508 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
EVGA(3842 6573) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 120
Parallax 111
87% 113 fps
MRender 98.8
Gravity 99.2
Splatting 105
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MyDigitalSSD BPX NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM04.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 162 164 152 150 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 808
Write 164
Mixed 252
SusWrite 154
75% 345 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 42.4
160% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 512
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 220
191% 294 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 106%
Great: 178%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
212GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 368 432 424 440 434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 442
Mixed 376
SusWrite 410
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 62.8
213% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
155GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 257 259 254 258 250 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 274
Mixed 314
SusWrite 270
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 55.9
198% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 234
210% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 28.4
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 26.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $918
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback