PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110510 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 04 '19 at 06:53 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.5%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 75 71 69 65 69 MB/s
|
55.8%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$30
227GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 97 98 94 100 102 MB/s
|
55.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
41.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 156x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 120x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 116x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 73x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 48x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $225 |